Indonesia: Investigate security forces’ violence against protesters

IndonesiaProtests

CIVICUS calls on the Indonesian authorities to immediately investigate and punish security forces personnel responsible for unleashing violence against peaceful protesters. The global civil society alliance condemns the excessive use of force and arbitrary arrests of mass protesters.

“The brutal crackdown on protests against Parliament's attempts to rig election laws shows a blatant disregard of the right to peaceful assembly. Indonesia is bound by both national and international laws to respect protest rights. The authorities must publicly condemn violence, hold perpetrators to account, and unconditionally release those detained," said Josef Benedict, CIVICUS Asia researcher

More than 200 protesters, including minors, were arbitrarily arrested and detained without due process or any sufficient or credible evidence in Jakarta. Most have been released.

On 22 August 2024, thousands of people including students took to the streets across Indonesia as the law makers prepared to reverse a Constitutional Court order on candidate age restrictions. The amendments would have allowed outgoing President Joko Widodo’s youngest son to contest, further enhancing the political influence of Widodo. This plan was halted following the protests.

Police attacked protests near the parliament in Jakarta with tear gas and water cannons. Reports and videos showed police physically assaulting protestors with batons and kicking them. Many suffered injuries and were hospitalized. Military personnel were also seen committing violence against protesters. Crackdowns on protests were also reported in other cities including Bandung, Semarang, and Makassar.

Some protesters are now facing charges. Among those arrested include activists from civil society groups Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Jakarta and Lokataru. Reports show that lawyers were denied access and prevented from providing legal aid to the detained protesters. Some protesters were also doxed by the authorities.

Journalists Safety Committee (KKJ) reports that journalists were also targeted. At least 11 journalists were intimidated, threatened, or suffered injuries. 

In May 2024, the UN Human Rights Committee that monitors the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) raised concerns about harassment, intimidation, surveillance, and excessive use of force faced by peaceful protesters, members of civil society, students, academics, and trade union leaders in Indonesia.

“People still in detention for peacefully exercising their rights must be freed immediately and unconditionally, with all charges dropped. A clear message must be sent to the security forces to exercise restraint when policing protests in line with Indonesia’s international human rights obligations including the ICCPR and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, considering minors were involved," added Benedict.

CIVICUS calls for authorities to follow due process and to respect and protect human rights and people’s fundamental freedoms of citizens at all times.

Indonesia is currently rated Obstructed by the CIVICUS Monitor.

Singapore: Online Criminal Harms Act another legal instrument to suppress civic space

Singapore parliamentThe Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) and CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation are deeply concerned over Singapore’s recently passed Online Criminal Harms Act. 

We call on the Government of Singapore to withdraw this law, which contravenes international legal and human rights law and standards –including the rights to freedom of expression, association, participation in public affairs, and privacy. 

Without intervention from the international community, this law could further curtail civic space, both online and offline. 

On 5 July 2023, the Parliament of Singapore went through and passed the Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA), first tabled on 8 May under the pretext “to deal more effectively with online activities that are criminal in nature.’ The Act will allow the government to exercise arbitrary power and discretion against individuals and entities–including internet service providers–to remove, block, and restrict content it suspects as a scam or malicious cyber activities. The Act also has an extra-territorial implication, in which the government can order individuals ‘whether or not a resident or citizen of Singapore, whether physically present in Singapore or outside Singapore’ and entities ‘whether formed, constituted or registered in Singapore or outside Singapore.’

‘We are concerned with the far-reaching implication of the OCHA, which will affect the protection of freedom of expression in Singapore and beyond. The Act will facilitate the arbitrary exercise of power by the government against critical voices and oppositions, particularly human rights defenders demanding justice and accountability,’ said Mary Aileen Diez-Bacalso, Executive Director of FORUM-ASIA.

Potential threat to freedom of expression

The OCHA is the latest addition to Singapore’s legal ecosystem regulating freedom of expression in contravention of international human rights law and standards. 

In 2019, Singapore adopted the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), which allows the government to issue a correction order against individuals - regardless of citizenship and location– suspected of communicating falsehood. And in 2021– despite criticisms from international and regional civil society–the government adopted the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act to tackle ‘hostile information campaigns’ that seek to ‘polarise society, influence its domestic political discourse and undermine its political sovereignty.’  

Like OCHA, both laws also have extraterritorial implication and give overbroad power to the government. 

FORUM-ASIA and CIVICUS  are  concerned how OCHA could be used by the Singaporean Government to stifle freedom of expression in the country, particularly that of critical voices. 

Compounding our worries is how the government was reported to have already issued POFMA 100 times since the law’s passage. Of these instances, 35 of which were brought against opposition political parties and political figures. POFMA has also been used against Lawyers for Liberty, a non-governmental organisation based in Malaysia that reports on Singapore’s death penalty cases. Likewise, it was used against Asia Sentinel, a media outlet now banned in Singapore. 

Given the government’s alarming track record of using laws to silence dissent, we are worried that a similar approach could also be taken when implementing OCHA. 

FORUM-ASIA and CIVICUS urge the Government of Singapore to withdraw the OCHA and to refrain from introducing any legal instruments that could further undermine human rights and fundamental freedoms. 

‘We call on the government to uphold its obligations under international law to protect, promote, and fulfil the universality of human rights. It must work to safeguard people’s freedom of expression and refrain from further attacking Singapore’s already declining civic freedom,’ said David Kode, Advocacy and Campaigns Lead at CIVICUS. 

**

About FORUM-ASIA:

The Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) is a network of 85 member organisations across 23 countries, mainly in Asia. Founded in 1991, FORUM-ASIA works to strengthen movements for human rights and sustainable development through research, advocacy, capacity development and solidarity actions in Asia and beyond. It has consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, and consultative relationship with the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. The FORUM-ASIA Secretariat is based in Bangkok, with offices in Jakarta, Geneva and Kathmandu. www.forum-asia.org

About CIVICUS:

CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation is a global alliance dedicated to strengthening citizen action and civil society around the world with 8,500 members in more than 175 countries. Based out of Johannesburg, CIVICUS has offices in New York and Geneva. www.civicus.org

For media inquiries, please contact:

  • Communication and Media Programme, FORUM-ASIA,

Global civil society alliance urges Human Rights Council members to support debate on Uyghur abuses report

China rights UN protest Gallo

Global civil society alliance, CIVICUS is urging UN Human Rights Council member states to do the right thing by voting in support of a resolution to debate the human rights situation in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). The vote is expected to take place this week.

El Salvador: No más ataques a la sociedad civil y a las libertades cívicas

El gobierno prolonga el estado de excepción con detenciones masivas sin precedentes y restricciones a los derechos cívicos.

Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil exigen a Túnez que elimine todas las restricciones impuestas al espacio cívico, así como a los organismos independientes y que se restablezca el Estado de Derecho

Más de 100 organizaciones de la sociedad civil suscriben la declaración que reclama el fin de las restricciones en Túnez.

CONTACTA CON NOSOTROS

CANALES DIGITALES

SUDÁFRICA
25  Owl Street, 6th Floor
Johannesburgo,
Sudáfrica,
2092
Tel: +27 (0)11 833 5959
Fax: +27 (0)11 833 7997

UN HUB: GINEBRA
11 Avenue de la Paix
Ginebra
Suiza
CH-1202
Tel: +41.79.910.34.28

UN HUB: NUEVA YORK
CIVICUS, c/o We Work
450 Lexington Ave
Nueva York
NY 10017
Estados Unidos