Close


FROM THE DESK OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL


Civil society taking centre stage on accountability


Release Date: 15 December 2006

By Kumi Naidoo, CIVICUS Secretary-General


Dear e-CIVICUS Subscribers,

We in CIVICUS join the United Nations in paying tribute to outgoing UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and in welcoming Ban Ki-moon. I would like to thank all those individuals who have challenged and inspired the work of civil society in 2006. Throughout this past year, civil society has continued to attract growing levels of scrutiny in its role as a major public actor. It has been forced to grapple with both external and internal challenges, from those who are seeking to make civil society stronger and more credible, as well as from those who question its right to play certain roles. In this week’s column, I would like to share with you the thoughts of Diana Eltahawy, CIVICUS Civil Society Networks Coordinator, on why civil society has taken centre stage on accountability?

Warmest regards,

Kumi Naidoo

International Advocacy NGO Accountability Charter: Walking the talk

By Diana Eltahawy, CIVICUS Civil Society Networks Coordinator

In recent years, debates around the concept of accountability have increasingly resonated throughout academic, policy-making, business, government and civil society circles. While there is no consensus on the meaning of accountability, there exists a common agreement that those who wield power or influence need to account for their actions and for the consequences of those actions. As the role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) has evolved from that of embryonic actors to key players in the defence and promotion of public goods such as sustainable development, environmental protection, human rights, poverty eradication and security; the issue of NGOs accountability has taken centre stage both internally and externally.

The proliferation, visibility and increased access to public money and decision-making fora have questioned the sufficiency of the premise from which NGOs traditionally drew their legitimacy and accountability: their values and ethical objectives. External criticism of NGOs’ lack of accountability emanate from actors that wish to see the curtailment or even the demise of the sector, all well as those that support NGOs’ right to exist and believe in their capacity to challenge the status quo. Within the sector, the realisation that NGOs’ performance and sustainability largely depend upon their ability to balance multiple accountabilities have led to calls to improve their accountability particularly to people whose rights and well-being they claim to protect and advance. While significant progress has been made in terms of NGOs’ functional accountability or accounting for appropriate resource usage for designated activities, there remains a lack of strategic accountability which refers to the wider impact and bearing of NGOs’ activities and advocacy particularly on those stakeholders that unlike governments and donors cannot exercise sanctions by withholding NGOs’ right to operate or NGOs’ resources.

In response to the need to strengthen accountability, the sector has experienced a notable growth in the usage of multiple regulation tools such as self-assessments, fiscal and social audits, independent evaluations, voluntary codes of conduct and certification schemes. The first three mechanisms are largely internal organisational initiatives, while the last two self-regulating mechanisms are broader in scope and scale, possess an element of peer review, and serve the purpose of not only improving the legitimacy and accountability of individual organisations but of the sector as a whole. This latter phenomenon of self-regulation has emerged both nationally, such and internationally. Additionally, self-regulating mechanisms fall under two categories: either sector-wide initiatives such as the NGO Code of Conduct for Ethiopia or thematic ones such as the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership International, which focuses on humanitarian and relief work. The processes that drive these initiatives include the desire to improve the sector’s legitimacy, promote common standards of accountability, sustain and when necessary restore public trust, counter criticism, lead by example and prevent the imposition of onerous and restrictive regulations by governments.

One such voluntary self-regulating initiative to create and implement common standards of accountability is the International Non-Governmental Organisations (INGO) Accountability Charter, which was officially launched on 6 June 2006. Targeting the particular needs of organisations working across diverse cultures, societies and issues; it was conceptualised and developed by a group of leading INGOs that includes Amnesty International, Greenpeace International, CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation, Oxfam International and the International Save the Children Alliance with the close involvement of the Hauser Center for Non-Profit Organisations. The INGO Accountability Charter both reaffirms INGOs rights to assembly, association and expression grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; as well as their responsibility to work towards the achievement of their missions effectively and transparently in accordance to their values and to remain accountable to their multiple stakeholders. The INGO Accountability Charter initiative demonstrates the importance INGOs collectively attach to transparency and accountability as sources of their legitimacy and as means to improve their performance and impact. The Accountability Charter serves the purpose of defining common values, policies and practices; improving communication with stakeholders; ameliorating signatories’ performance and promoting accountability and transparency both internally and externally. Through its provisions (on the respect of human rights, political and financial independence, responsible advocacy, participatory and effective programmes, non-discrimination, transparency in reporting activities and financial performance, accuracy of information, good governance, professional management and ethical fundraising); the Accountability Charter lays the framework for high standards of moral and professional conduct. Upon signing the Charter, INGOs commit themselves to apply its provisions progressively to all their programmes, advocacy and operations. Signatories are required to submit annual reports outlining their compliance to the Charter and to conduct an annual independent fiscal audit.

The Accountability Charter is currently governed by its 11 Founding Signatories (ActionAid International, Amnesty International, CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation, Consumers International, Greenpeace International, Oxfam International, Save the Children Alliance, Survival International, International Federation Terre des Hommes, Transparency International and World YWCA). They are responsible for making decisions regarding the implementation of the Charter and its future development. CIVICUS serves as the secretariat for the Charter, administering the day to day activities including the sign-on process. It is important to recognise that the launch of the Charter is merely a starting point for setting and implementing a system that would improve the accountability of INGOs. The Charter Management Committee, elected by the Founding Signatories to oversee the sign-on and reporting processes, is currently in the process of developing a structure to ensure signatory compliance. Discussions are ongoing regarding the development of compliance indicators through a multi-stakeholder process under the Global Reporting Initiative, the consolidation of the reporting process, and the creation of an independent complaints handling mechanism.

While the INGO Accountability Charter initiative is still in its nascent form, it has tremendous potential to become an effective self-regulatory accountability mechanism that allows stakeholders to hold signatories accountable, propels signatories to ameliorate their performance through the implementation of Charter provisions, and creates high accountability standards for the sector as a whole.

For more information about the INGO Accountability Charter please email diana.eltahawy@civicus.org.

Yours truly,

Diana Elthawy

Below you will find all previous columns published within e-CIVICUS editions.

Human Rights Day: Righting the Wrongs

Sharing member impressions and why civil society should be part of CIVICUS’ alliance

16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence

CIVICUS strategic planning takes centre stage

Reflections on the CIVICUS Civil Society Index country reports

Reflections on the CIVICUS Civil Society Index country reports

Civil society and the challenge of Regional Integration in the Pacific

Over 20 Million People 'STAND UP AGAINST POVERTY' to Set New Guinness World Record

People created poverty. Only people can eradicate it." World-wide commemoration of October 17: International Day for the Eradication of Poverty

Campaigning Works!

If only civil society was taken seriously: Reflections on the fifth anniversary of the tragedy of 11 September 2001

Help set a Guinness world record by standing up to poverty

Civil society takes centre stage at the AIDS Conference

Can we reform the International Finance Institutions?

Article on the Doha collapse

Civil Society and the Middle East Conflict

Reflections of a Meeting with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin

You can participate in the CIVICUS World Assembly even if you are not going to be there in person

Can Civil Society make a difference in Iraq?

The Ethics of Cherry Picking: The dilemma of where you live, work and play!!!

Former CIVICUS Board Member passes away

Reflections on a visit to prison

The struggle for justice is a marathon not a sprint: A personal reflection

Can Civil Society make 2006 a year of more and better coherence, coordination and communication?

What 2005 means for civil society?

Argentina: Thriving without the IMF

Can legal frameworks strengthen civil society? Is the time right for a Campaign for Civil Society Rights?

Why trade justice matters to you

December 2005: Determined, Dedicated and Diverse Dimensions to Direct Action For Justice, Human Rights and Equality

Reflections on the United Nations Summit

Civil society gears up for the UN World Summit

Reflections on the G8 Summit

Nelson Mandela: Inspiring civil society efforts to create a just world

Children, youth and the struggle for a just world

So we think democracy is growing?: Rethinking social exclusion

You can make difference on ‘Whiteband Day’ - 1 July 2005

CSW Monthly Bulletin provides a global forum to protect the rights of civil society

What does democracy really mean today

The absence of democracy at the World Bank

Grassroots activism: ordinary people making an extraordinary difference

Madrid, Manhattan, Manica and Musina: Civic activism driving the agenda for social and political justice

On International Women's Day civil society wonders if this is Beijing Plus Ten or Beijing Minus Ten

Internal governance: Responding to the challenge of civil society legitimacy, accountability and transparency

Poverty or social exclusion - What unites civil society in the North and South?

Should civil society engage with governing institutions even when they have deep democratic deficits?

One month gone, eleven to go: Is 2005 the year civil society focuses on its common shared values and agrees to disagree on strategy and tactics?

The beginnings of the biggest ever mobilisation against poverty launched at the World Social Forum

Civil Society gears up for a major global campaign against poverty

What the Tsunami Tragedy means for Civil Society.

Back to CIVICUS Home page.