Updates
Subscribe to our feeds
Get updates directly in your inbox/your web-browser or preffered reader.
Grab our feeds now!
Civil Society Vacancies
CIVICUS Media Centre
EveryHumanHasRights
CIVICUS World Assembly Blog
Learn more about RSS and other webfeeds
News
| Press Releases |
| Video Feeds |
| e-CIVICUS Newsletters |
| CIVICUS e-Newsletters |
| Desk of the Secretary General |
|
|
|
Impact for What? - Cairo Conference on Impact Evaluation Katsuji Imata, Deputy Secretary General-Programmes, CIVICUS Hype around Impact But what is ‘impact' after all and how do we measure it? We are told by our donors, evaluation consultants and others that ‘impact' is about long term results. ‘Output' refers to an immediate result and there is ‘outcome' as a medium term result that will be achieved when all outputs are laid out. The next in line in the logical order is ‘impact.' You go up the causal chain to reach the highest point which we call ‘impact,' and that is what development is all about. Make sense? Well, kind of... We all know the world is more complex than that, do we not? And for even more confusion - now ‘impact' is also used by many donors and agencies to refer to any change emanating from an intervention, whether it is short, medium or long term. So what do the experts have to say? This was the frame of mind when I travelled to Cairo to participate in the conference titled, Perspectives on Impact Evaluation - Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness on 29 March to 2 April. The conference was co-organised by the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) [http://www.3ieimpact.org/], the Networks of Networks on Impact Evaluation (NONIE) [http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/nonie/], the African Evaluation Association (AfrEA) [http://www.afrea.org/home/index.cfm] and UNICEF. More than 700 people from many different countries and a wide range of disciplines gathered for this event. Along with donors and CSOs (civil society organisations), there were a number of evaluation experts who were familiar with the language and discourse of the impact evaluation. Impact is Contested Terrain Interestingly, this last principle, which is sacrosanct in the work of development NGOs and CSOs, does not find home in the impact evaluation community. It does not mean that there is a shortage of awareness about this principle. Rather, it means that the impact evaluation discourse is often mired in the sea of theoretical contestations and methodological debates - which is very rich, intriguing and academically disciplined - and at the end of the day you can easily feel lost and forget what was the right question you should be asking. So what does it all mean to civil society practitioners? It means many things, but one of them, I think, is that we should ask back. When asked by your donor, "so what is the impact of your work?," do not rush to find a link between your outputs and larger results at the societal level. Instead, simply ask "what do you mean by impact?" and start a dialogue. From the conference organisers and participants, I have asked Zenda Ofir, Past President of AfrEA and Priyanthi Fernando, Executive Direcor of Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA) in Sri Lanka to share their reflections on the conference. In Solidarity, |
CIVICUS World Assembly Quick Updates:
Speakers
Programme
Regional Discussions
Programme Workshops
World Assembly Blog (RSS feed)
Keep in touch on facebook
Follow event on twitter (#civWA)
The World Assembly website
Citizen Media Rendevouz
Blogs from the World Assembly
Civil Society Index
Paul McAdam's Blog
Amnesty International Youth
Impact for What? - Cairo Conference on Impact Evaluation



